🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," said one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a leading peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more cautious tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this global conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.